Because Our Job is too Easy

Observer Editor • June 7, 2019

Share this article

            I find that there are two types of people in this world: Those who find interpreting to be awe-inspiring, and those who think it’s as simple as opening up Google Translate. Usually the ones who think it is simple haven’t actually tried it. I’m pretty sure I don’t need to tell you that ours is a tough job. Furthermore, we constantly need to explain ourselves to people who think we should be walking dictionaries; people who don’t understand why we may need to look up a term, or why we should have a partner with us for a trial. There are also times when we render extremely difficult interpretations and wish people realized! Sadly, people only ever seem to notice us when we’re messing up.

            The last time I wrote, I discussed mistakes we make, and how to correct them. This month, I thought of something similar but different: The mistakes we don’t make, but which could be perceived as such to the lay observer. I’ll explain what I mean: Sometimes we need to clarify, and it’s not obvious why. Especially if our clients are monolingual, there will be issues we need to resolve that they wouldn’t even know about.

            Here are three examples:

  • A word has been invented: My famous example, which I believe I’ve mentioned here before, occurred when a Puerto Rican defendant told the judge he was staying in a “cheta.” I’ve since learned that this has an obscure meaning in a specific country. But in this case, I had to stop the entire proceeding in order to clarify that actually, this was a Spanglicized version of the English word, shelter. Voila an interpreter who looks bad for not knowing something so simple and yet… it wasn’t my fault! (I resisted the temptation to tell this to the judge.)
  • Need for clarification: Sometimes we get a word like “child” in English, which is gender neutral. The trouble is that to render this word in Spanish (and, I’m sure, in other languages as well), we need to know the gender of the child. Asking for it is bound to get us some weird looks from people who just don’t get our job! (Since I interpreted on a daily basis in one family judge’s courtroom, I explained the predicament to her. After that, every time I interpreted for her, she gave me the children’s genders beforehand.)
  • Words that have more than one meaning: There are lots and lots and lots of words like this. For example, if you climbed the escalera in Spanish, it would be unclear whether to interpret this as ladder or stairs. Further clarification would be needed, and someone not familiar with the conundrum wouldn’t understand why.

My recommendation is to have a formula for providing a quick explanation, just so that your clients know what you are trying to accomplish. I’m sure that my examples are just a drop in the ocean. Feel free to put yours below!


Portrait of Athena Matilsky

Athena Matilsky fell in love with Spanish the year she turned 16. She chose it as her major at Rutgers University and selected a focus in translation and interpreting. After graduation, she taught elementary school in Honduras and then returned home to begin freelancing as a medical and court interpreter. She has since achieved certifications as a Healthcare Interpreter and a Federal Court Interpreter. She was the recent editor-in-chief of Proteus. Currently, she works as a freelance interpreter/translator and trains candidates privately for the state and federal interpreting exams. When she is not writing or interpreting, you may find her practicing acroyoga or studying French. Website: https://athenaskyinterpreting.wordpress.com/

We love to hear from our readers! If you wish to make a comment on this blog post, please use the comment box on the page below the post.

Categories

Archives

Select Month

The views and opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of NAJIT.

Recent Posts

By The Observer Editor June 17, 2026
Language is Evocative
By Observer Editor June 10, 2026
The Conference Between the Sessions
By The Observer Editor June 4, 2026
The Couch: Is There Still a Lane for Newcomers?
By Observer Editor May 28, 2026
B e a Swan, Not a Duck
By Observer Editor May 21, 2026
Wait… So What’s the Difference Between The Blog, CyberNews, and Proteus?
The NAJIT Observer logo featuring the words 'The NAJIT Observer' with two overlapping speech bubbles
By Observer Editor May 14, 2026
Court interpreting can be an isolating profession. This post explores the importance of building trusted professional networks, mentorship, and community within the interpreting field.
The NAJIT Observer logo featuring the words 'The NAJIT Observer' with two overlapping speech bubbles
By Observer Editor May 7, 2026
When AI-generated summaries begin influencing how interpreted testimony is remembered and discussed, where does ethical responsibility begin? This edition of “Let’s Test Your Ethics” explores the risks of administrative AI creep in the courtroom.
The NAJIT Observer logo featuring the words 'The NAJIT Observer' with two overlapping speech bubbles
By Observer Editor April 30, 2026
A reflection on the NAJIT 2026 Conference, highlighting community, connection, and the evolving role of judiciary interpreters and translators.
The NAJIT Observer logo featuring the words 'The NAJIT Observer' with two overlapping speech bubbles
By Observer Editor April 22, 2026
Preparing for the FCICE? These practical tips break down how to train effectively, avoid common mistakes, and build the discipline needed for federal certification.
The NAJIT Observer logo featuring the words 'The NAJIT Observer' with two overlapping speech bubbles
By Observer Editor April 16, 2026
A guest post exploring peer observation in interpreting, examining performance anxiety, professional growth, and the role of constructive feedback in strengthening the field.
Show More