Interpreting for Justice

Observer Editor • March 10, 2017

Share this article

The problem with court interpreting is that it’s messy. Heck, life is messy, and court interpreting is just a manifestation of our daily struggle with chaos.

Allow me to explain.

For months now I have been mentoring students to study for their tests; notably I’ve been coaching them for the federal exam, which is fast approaching. And tests, of course, are their own embodiment of the devil incarnate. But in a way, they are so simple. Tests are black and white. Points are awarded or not. A phrase is in the dictionary, or it isn’t. In other words, tests are clean.

Then there are the courts. Truly, the image of the courthouse is one both powerful and romantic, and I’m pretty sure it had been calling me for some time before I finally earned my way into those hallowed halls of justice. Growing up in a large family, I imagine I was attracted to the inherent and enforceable fairness of the courts. Within their structure, lawyers must abide by the same laws. Judges are trained to consider both sides before reaching a decision. Everyone has an opportunity to speak and all the parties involved have the obligation to play by the rules. So courts are neat and tidy, and we interpret that. Right? Not so fast.

Look. You don’t need me to tell you that people are fickle. The courts are designed to be fair but they can only be as fair as the people who govern them. And we are weak, us humans. We are weak and we are not all equal. Smarter lawyers may make more money. More money can therefore buy you a better defense. Judges and juries can be influenced, consciously or unconsciously. Sometimes, life isn’t fair.

Take first impressions, for example. Or tones of voice. The state of mind we are in when we present or hear a case. All that can determine how seriously we are taken as litigants. And we add another layer when we depend on another person—an interpreter—to be our voice. So, dare I say it? The impressions of an LEP are only as good as their interpreter is good.

There, I said it. But the truth is that court interpreting is complicated, and sometimes it’s hard to be good. We must navigate courtrooms with people who mumble, people with accents, people with regional linguistic differences. People who speak too fast, people who go on and on but don’t say anything at all. And we are supposed to process all of that while giving an accurate target language rendition, faithful not only to the words that are spoken but how they are said. Faithful to the underlying implications and tone. As interpreters we strive not to misrepresent, not to change register, not to interrupt. We don’t want to make people look argumentative or frustrated when it is really we, the interpreters, who are struggling.

And, ladies and gentlemen, you don’t need me to tell you that is insanely difficult. We make choices on a daily basis that have a huge impact on the lives of the people around us. We must truly interpret, determining in a split second whether a simple phrase like ¡Qué va! Is better off rendered as “Are you kidding?” or, “Of course.” Not to mention whether we should risk interrupting tearful testimony when we can’t understand the words through the sobs. The implications are subtle but significant.

So I know I’m a nerd. I’m proud of it, really. But I think that my affinity toward tests lies in their lack of ambiguity. It’s the fact that they can be broken down, examined, and reassembled. It’s about their finite number of variables. Tests may be scary, but court interpreting is messy. And call me a coward, but sometimes I prefer a pile of scoring units to the real, live thing.


Athena Matilsky fell in love with Spanish the year she turned 16. She chose it as her major at Rutgers University and selected a focus in translation and interpreting. After graduation, she taught elementary school in Honduras and then returned home to begin freelancing as a medical and court interpreter. She has since achieved certifications as a Healthcare Interpreter and a Federal Court Interpreter. She was the recent editor-in-chief of Proteus. Currently, she works as a freelance interpreter/translator and trains candidates privately for the state and federal interpreting exams. When she is not writing or interpreting, you may find her practicing acroyoga or studying French. Website: https://athenaskyinterpreting.wordpress.com /

We love to hear from our readers! If you wish to make a comment on this blog post, please use the comment box on the page below the post.

Categories

Archives

Select Month

The views and opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of NAJIT.

Recent Posts

By The Observer Editor June 17, 2026
Language is Evocative
By Observer Editor June 10, 2026
The Conference Between the Sessions
By The Observer Editor June 4, 2026
The Couch: Is There Still a Lane for Newcomers?
By Observer Editor May 28, 2026
B e a Swan, Not a Duck
By Observer Editor May 21, 2026
Wait… So What’s the Difference Between The Blog, CyberNews, and Proteus?
The NAJIT Observer logo featuring the words 'The NAJIT Observer' with two overlapping speech bubbles
By Observer Editor May 14, 2026
Court interpreting can be an isolating profession. This post explores the importance of building trusted professional networks, mentorship, and community within the interpreting field.
The NAJIT Observer logo featuring the words 'The NAJIT Observer' with two overlapping speech bubbles
By Observer Editor May 7, 2026
When AI-generated summaries begin influencing how interpreted testimony is remembered and discussed, where does ethical responsibility begin? This edition of “Let’s Test Your Ethics” explores the risks of administrative AI creep in the courtroom.
The NAJIT Observer logo featuring the words 'The NAJIT Observer' with two overlapping speech bubbles
By Observer Editor April 30, 2026
A reflection on the NAJIT 2026 Conference, highlighting community, connection, and the evolving role of judiciary interpreters and translators.
The NAJIT Observer logo featuring the words 'The NAJIT Observer' with two overlapping speech bubbles
By Observer Editor April 22, 2026
Preparing for the FCICE? These practical tips break down how to train effectively, avoid common mistakes, and build the discipline needed for federal certification.
The NAJIT Observer logo featuring the words 'The NAJIT Observer' with two overlapping speech bubbles
By Observer Editor April 16, 2026
A guest post exploring peer observation in interpreting, examining performance anxiety, professional growth, and the role of constructive feedback in strengthening the field.
Show More