What Would You Have Done? By Editor

Do you have an experience to share? Please write to the Editor. Our work is confidential and all identifiable details are removed from the stories shared with us to maintain compliance with our Code of Ethics. This space is for us to help each other overcome or prepare for unexpected situations.

And we would like to thank our colleagues who have shared their experiences with us.

Editor’s Note: The comments section is not working. We are working to correct the issue. In the meantime, please comment on our Facebook page or Twitter or send your comment to the Editor.

Editor’s Note 2: Coments have been enabled and we look forward to hearing from you again.

The interpreter has been interpreting in a lengthy jury trial. The jury is well into their deliberations. They come into the courtroom for the judge to answer a question. The judge gives them instructions and sends them back to the jury room. As the first jurors enter the jury room, while the door into the courtroom is still open, the interpreter hears one of them make a comment to another (relevant to the matter, not small talk). It appears that the Court and counsel did not hear the comment, although they are closer to the jurors than the interpreter is.

Here is the conflict: To interpret or not interpret for the LEP individual? And does it matter what the comment was?

1- Interpret, after all you are there to interpret all that is said and heard by you.
2- If neither the judge or the attorney bother to ask “What did you say?”, just ignore it.
3- Use my own judgment: if I don’t think it matters, ignore it.
4- Use my own judgment: if I think it matters, interpret it.
5- …………………..