Few moments in the courtroom are as powerful as a victim impact statement. For victims and their families, the victim impact statement is more than a procedural step in sentencing. It is the moment when they turn toward the defendant and speak directly to the court. They describe the sleepless nights, the empty chair at the table, the medical bills, the endless therapy sessions, the fear that lingers long after the courtroom lights go out. They articulate grief, anger, betrayal, confusion, and, sometimes, forgiveness. It is raw and it is
personal.
When that statement must be interpreted, our responsibility changes in a particular way, the interpreter becomes the voice through which that message is delivered. It is a tremendous responsibility and one that should not be taken lightly. The task is not only to convey words accurately but to carry the emotional force faithfully across languages. Preparation, in those moments, is not a luxury. It is essential.
I recall the exact moment when I felt something shifting: a sentencing at which the victim’s sister prepared a written statement after her brother was killed in a senseless street fight. Her grief was profound, but what sustained her was her faith. Her statement was deeply religious, interwoven with passages from the Bible that had given her comfort and strength. For her, those words were not ornamental. They were
her foundation. They were how she made sense of her loss.
On that occasion, I was handed the statement approximately ten minutes before I had to sight-translate it in the courtroom, in front of reporters, TV cameras and, most importantly, the victim’s sister herself. As I always do, I reviewed it with pen in hand, marking syntactic shifts, identifying potential ambiguities, flagging proper names, and noting terminology that might pose a problem. When I reached the biblical passages, I paused. Rather than paraphrase or approximate them, I looked them up and wrote them out just as they appear in the Bible. I made clear notations indicating that they were direct quotations that I was to read and not sight-translate. I was not going to “wing” the religious text that was so central to her message.